dcsimg

Supreme Court could bring arbitration back to credit card agreements

By , CardRatings contributor
  • Google +
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
supreme-court-arbitration-back-to-credit-card-agreements

A recent Supreme Court ruling could restore binding arbitration clauses to the terms and conditions of many American credit cards. Eight of the Supreme Court Justices ruled in favor of CompuCredit, a company marketing credit cards for bad credit. The company's customers had attempted to sue CompuCredit for marketing a Visa credit card that only retained $43 of available credit after applying initial service fees and upfront finance charges.

Although the Credit CARD Act now prohibits that kind of "fee harvester" account, lawyers and judges debated whether the arbitration clause in CompuCredit's initial credit card application could prevent customers from suing the company in court.

Larger banks, like Chase and Capital One, had already abandoned binding arbitration clauses in their contracts with customers. SmartMoney's AnnaMaria Andriotis found some industry analysts speculating that the Supreme Court ruling may inspire at least a few banks to bring arbitration clauses back to their standard operating procedures.

Balancing company costs with consumer protection

Advocates of binding arbitration clauses suggest that the practice eliminates the cost of fighting frivolous lawsuits filed by disgruntled customers. Despite concerns that some arbitrators harbor undisclosed links or loyalties to large banks, the Supreme Court Justices failed to find precedent guaranteeing consumers the right to sue over a product or service they willingly requested.

Still, foes of the practice suggest that the ruling could open up new opportunities to strengthen consumer protection laws. In a recent column, the Washington Post's Michelle Singletary reported that incoming Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director Richard Cordray has already been tasked by Congress with reviewing the banking industry's arbitration practices. The CFPB retains the power to impose new limits on binding arbitration clauses, provided it finds such clauses act against consumer interests.

0 Responses to "Supreme Court could bring arbitration back to credit card agreements"

No Comments

Leave a Comment
 
 
 
About Our Ratings ×

Our editors rate credit cards objectively based on the features the credit card offers consumers, the fees and interest rates, and how a credit card compares with other cards in its category. Ratings vary by category, and the same card may receive a certain number of stars in one category and a higher or lower number in another.

The ratings are the expert opinion of our editors, and not influenced by any remuneration this site may receive from card issuers.

Advertisers in our database are highlighted, and advertisements include an option to apply using links on our site. CardRatings.com may be compensated by companies mentioned on the site when a user's application is accepted or approved by such companies.

How do your cards stack up?

Compare your card starting here

NEXT »

Featured Partner Cards

loading